Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Holist Nurs Pract ; 36(4): 232-246, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909000

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of acupressure on sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and quality of life among older people in Australia. Acupressure improved overall subjective sleep quality and anxiety but no differences in depression and quality of life. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to generate good evidence.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Aged , Australia , Humans , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Sleep , Sleep Quality
2.
J Nurs Manag ; 30(6): 1903-1912, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1832180

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the mediating role of fear and resilience on the relationship between clinical nurses' reporting of skin lesions and their anxiety and depression during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: Prolonged personal protective equipment wearing may cause severe skin lesions among clinical nurses. The possible relationship between clinical nurses' reporting of skin lesions and their anxiety and depression remains unknown. Moreover, little is known about what factors could mediate such a relationship. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional online survey. CHERRIES was used to report results. RESULTS: Of 2014 participants, 94.8% (n = 1910) reported skin lesions. Skin lesions were positively related to anxiety (p < .001, ß = .228, SE = .099) and depression (p < .001, ß = .187, SE = .093). Fear activated while resilience buffered the relationship between clinical nurses' reporting of skin lesions and anxiety and between skin lesions and depression. CONCLUSION: Reduced fear and enhanced resilience level were related to decreased levels of anxiety and depression among clinical nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers should evaluate the occurrence and severity of clinical nurses' skin lesions, arrange reasonable working duration to relieve skin lesions, provide appropriate psychological support to reduce clinical nurses' fear and implement various strategies to enhance their resilience, thereby decreasing their anxiety and depression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000030290.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nurses , Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/complications , Depression/epidemiology , Fear , Humans , Pandemics
3.
Vaccine ; 40(21): 2949-2959, 2022 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1773837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality globally. As vaccines have been developed under expedited conditions, their safety and efficacy are being questioned by some populations leading to vaccine hesitancy, resulting in delayed vaccine uptake and herd immunity. This study aims to adopt a combination of Health Belief Model and other independent risk factors associated with high vaccine acceptance. METHODS: An anonymized cross-sectional survey was distributed between 15 January and 3 February 2021 across Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia among adult respondents through a certified online panel. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out to assess perception constructs followed by multivariate regression modelling to assess factors associated with high vaccine acceptance against SARS_CoV-2. RESULTS: A total of 3,133 anonymised participants from Singapore (n = 1,009), Australia (n = 1,118) and Hong Kong (n = 1,006) completed the survey. While age and gender were not significantly associated, Asian ethnicity, current smokers and self-efficacy were significant associated factors of increased vaccine acceptance. While specific practices like taking micronutrients more frequently, cleaning and disinfecting their house more often were positively associated with increased vaccine acceptance, seeking medical help for COVID-19 symptoms like loss of smell/taste and overall COVID-19 knowledge score were negatively associated. Increased likelihood of vaccine acceptance was seen among those that obtained COVID-19 information less frequently and used digital media or non-health-related sources like influencers as a source of information. Among the eight perception constructs, perceived susceptibility and perceived response efficacy were positively associated, while perceived barriers were negatively associated with high vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: While demographic parameters have weak association with vaccine acceptance, perceptions and practices parameters can help to better understand and influence vaccine acceptance. Study findings should provide guidance on the risk communication strategy to enhance vaccine acceptance for vaccination and boosters against new SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Internet , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Singapore/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
J Clin Nurs ; 31(5-6): E3-E5, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1685368

Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Aged , Humans
5.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(9): 3880-3893, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1325009

ABSTRACT

AIM: Frontline nurses' willingness to work has significant implications for maintaining workforce stability and quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, few studies have investigated their willingness and the corresponding reasons. This study aims to examine frontline nurses' willingness to work, identify its predictors and explore its corresponding reasons. DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was conducted. METHODS: Based on a multilevel behavioural-diagnostic model, a questionnaire survey was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data concurrently from 13 February to 24 February 2020 to explore frontline nurses' willingness to work and the corresponding reasons in two hospitals in Wuhan, China. One was a designated hospital which only received COVID-19 patients, and the other was built up temporarily for COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Of the 2014 participants, most (n = 1950, 96.8%) indicated their willingness to work, and a few (n = 64, 3.2%) expressed their unwillingness. Binary logistic regression analysis identified five predictors of participants' willingness to work, including monthly family income, average working hours per shift, belief in their colleagues' preparedness, belief in their hospitals' preparedness and levels of depression. These indicators explained 27% of the variance (p < .05). Frontline nurses' willingness to work mainly arose from professional commitment, patriotism and faith, while unwillingness to do so primarily stemmed from safety concerns and family responsibility. CONCLUSION: Most frontline nurses were willing to work and showed great professional commitment. IMPACT: Professional commitment and patriotism were two important individual-level factors affecting frontline nurses' willingness to work during a pandemic. Strategies should be implemented, such as appreciating and acknowledging their contribution, rewarding their valuable work, arranging reasonable working hours, enhancing colleagues' and hospitals' preparedness, and providing emotional support. Moreover, adequate personal protective equipment, self-protection training and social support should be ensured to address frontline nurses' safety concerns and family responsibility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nurses , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL